Game theory online dating
Once participants had completed this, within a month after participating, single participants were invited to participate in a second study.Depending on condition, some participants thought this study also pertained to personality (no online dating control condition), while others thought they were coming in to help the University pilot test its new online dating service.Within the group expecting to test the online dating service, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: do not meet date, meet date online in one week, or meet date in person in one week. Our results indicated that men who expected to meet their date online said they were more agreeable, emotionally stable, and attractive (even when we controlled for this with coders' ratings of attractiveness based on photographs of the participants) than they were at time 1.
Women, on the other hand, are thought to present themselves as blonder, thinner, and bustier.It is easier to weed out the ugly ones than those who are not wealthy / successful. That was the way one woman put it, on yahoo dating, way back when it was a free service.The systemic outcome is a predictable manifestation of women selecting for BSers they are incapable of detecting. This is because women use honesty strictly in their own self-interest, at the expense of the other person. An honest man gives up the info without any effort or skill on the woman's part, and is thus kinda like a woman who is too "easy" - it looks desperate.Lesson learned for the ladies: be alert to the kinds of gifts that he gives and whether he is willing to persist, even without sex.You can read Part II right now and learn how women use other signals to decide mating strategies and whether to sleep with the guy.